On this wet Sunday morning it’s a good time for me to touch on a number of things that have been on my mind. I guess these are my Sunday morning random thoughts
REBUILD OIL CITY
First, there is an interesting new blog -- Rebuild Oil City (http://rebuildoilcity.blogspot.com/) – by Scott Smail. I urge everyone to click over, take a look and join in the conversation.
Blogs about local issues can be important tools for community involvement and innovation. Certainly that appears to be the spirit behind Scott’s blog. Scott and I have our share of disagreements, but no one can question his desire to better Oil City.
MAIN STREET
The Oil City Main Street Program continues to move forward.
Two months ago the Mission and Vision statements were completed and approved. They are posted at the bottom of this blog.
Another huge step will be taken this week with the filing of the Oil City Profile, a pre-application requirement of the state Department of Community and Economic Development. Dozens of people put hours into gathering the information necessary to submit the profile. John Phillips of the Oil Region Alliance had the task of pulling it all together and keeping everyone on track. I didn’t envy him, but he got it done.
In addition, the subcommittees are embarking on their individual planning journeys. Each is required to develop a one-year and five year plan outlining their goals and objectives and how they intend to reach them. It is an involved process that in the end will guide the rebirth of our downtown. The subcommittees expect to have their one-year plan in place by January.
THE STATE BUDGET
Disappointed and frustrated with our legislature is putting it mildly.
Under the pending budget deal the state is going to tax bingo and small games of chance that support so many of our area’s nonprofits and community organizations, including providing funding for the Venango County’s Humane Society’s spay and neuter program. The state is going to impose the 6 percent sales tax on performing arts shows – read Barrow Theater productions and the Oil City Arts Council’s musical performances in the Transit. But, the state is NOT going to tax cigars and smokeless tobacco. I sure don’t understand how small games of chance and performing arts represent more discretionary spending that the use of the tobacco products.
The budget deal calls for forcing the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to lease tens of thousands of acres of state forest lands for oil and gas development, notably Marcellus shale gas development. Leasing state lands is nothing new for DCNR, but it is done carefully and prudently. Forcing the lease of so much land to balance the state budget really limits the care that can be taken. The budget deal also ends the 55-year-old Oil and Gas Lease Fund where money from leased state land was placed and used to maintain our state parks and other environmental projects and instead dumps it into the General Fund.
Missing from the budget deal is any severance tax on Marcellus Shale or other oil and gas development, despite the fact severance taxes are in place in nearly every other oil and gas producing state.
I have yet to discern what the state budget means for many state programs important to the future of Oil City. The details are not yet out there, but the rumors do not sound good. It appears some of those programs are lost or severely reduced, and in many other cases, the costs for services are being pushed down to the county and local level. Let’s hope the rumors are wrong.
Times are tough and the legislature faced real problems, but I think we deserved better.
THE PROMISED OC MAIN STREET MISSION AND VISION
Oil City Main Street Mission and Vision
Mission:
The Oil City Main Street mission is to make Oil City’s downtown business district aesthetically pleasing and economically viable, providing a foundation for the healthy growth and success of current and future businesses for the benefit of current and future residents. Our downtown will become the regional destination for visitors to enjoy the arts, recreation and entertainment by leveraging our rich heritage and natural resources.
Vision:
OUR VISION is a community where we all work in concert to make Oil City a desirable place to work, live and visit. A Main Street community that has:
· A main street district with restored historic architecture and attractive streetscapes
· Scenic waterways, walking and bike trails that will provide river access and opportunities for recreation;
· A vibrant artist community that supports art and cultural in a visitor friendly venue;
· Downtown niche businesses that offer unique and enjoyable retail, restaurant and accommodation experiences;
· Professional services that support the wellbeing and vitality of our citizens and local economy;
· Quaint and affordable residential apartments and town homes in the upper stories of downtown buildings;
· Connections to the emerging technology that will enhance opportunities and allow our businesses to be responsive to changing markets and customer needs and
· Academic and research programs provided by Clarion University - Venango Campus, Dubois Business College, the Venango Technology Center and the Oil City School District that will augment the skill sets and knowledge needed to grow our local economy and connect us to world markets.
The ambiance of our downtown will shine, known for its rich history, vibrant arts and culture and spectacular natural assets of river and hills. The dynamic businesses located in our downtown will thrive in an environment that connects history, culture, emerging technology and human assets in our own unique way.
Rules of the Road
The purpose of this blog is to share with you my thoughts on issues pertaining to Oil City and Venango County and to foster discussion.
However, that requires some basic rules. Personal attacks, inappropriate language and venom-filled postings will not be tolerated. Comments will be screened, and if necessary edited, before posting.
Disagreement and a variety of opinions are encouraged, but I ask that it always be in a respectful, positive manner. So fire away, but do so cleanly
However, that requires some basic rules. Personal attacks, inappropriate language and venom-filled postings will not be tolerated. Comments will be screened, and if necessary edited, before posting.
Disagreement and a variety of opinions are encouraged, but I ask that it always be in a respectful, positive manner. So fire away, but do so cleanly
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Hi John. Thanks for the update on these important topics. I am hopeful you will have success with the Main Street program. I will tell you I have some concern with the "everything but the kitchen sink" vision that was crafted. To be effective, visions really should be focused and measurable. Good luck getting concensus on all of that. No big deal - you can still do whatever you want - even if you by some odd chance you left it out!
I recently walked through the downtown area and must admit that there is A LOT of trash everywhere - even in the newly constructed plantings. That is a shame. They are also full of weeds and already straggly looking. When the plan was crafted for these plantings, you would have to think the engineer planned WHO would MAINTAIN them. Right? Unfortunately, many are in front of empty buildings so good luck with the landlords lending a hand. I have an "out of the box" idea though. How about the city EMPLOYEES doing it? With all the folks out of work, I'm sure everyone working at City Hall is very appreciative to the local tax payers that employ them. What a great thing it would be if once a month EVERYONE pulling a paycheck from we the taxpayers, dressed in comfortable clothes and went out and picked up the trash and pulled weeds! The TOWN is their place of employment and they should take pride in it and want it to look it's best. PLEASE don't tell me they don't have time. I am a salaried employee and I work 50-60 hours a week sometimes for the same pay. I frequently help clean up, spruce up and maintain our office. Actually, if whomever was responsible for enforcing the littering laws in town, there wouldn't be that much to do. Do we have those laws? Who should be enforcing them? The police? Do they walk around at all and possibly see litterbugs? I see litterbugs all time walking to very specific businesses - typically. Funny how the police never do. How about the meter lady? Does she see people littering? It's time to "MAN UP", "GET A SPINE" and "CRACK DOWN" on this. Why? Because that is what we the tax payers pay for! Before anyone accuses me of just complaining, you should know I volunteer quite often and regularly on my free time. I just don't expect other people to do my job. Also, before you get ready to launch a defense of City workers, save it. EVERYONE has a few spare hours a month. EVERYONE.
Thank you very much for this vehicle to voice ideas. You are doing the City a great & MUCH NEEDED service!
First,
I think all of us, every citizen, should take some responsibility for cleaning up our downtown and neighborhoods.
I think sending out our city workers to do that is probably not the best use of their city time. I can assure you most are actively engaged in the community doing a lot on their own as volunteers for different groups and causes, including the city.
I totally agree about the lack of enforsement of the littering laws. I and other memebers of council have raised that issue repeatedly. In the time I've been on council I don't think a single littering citation has been issued. That is not acceptable.
"I think sending out our city workers to do that is probably not the best use of their city time."
John, you could not have thought this statement out much before you made it. MAINTAINING the CITY's PROPERTIES is not the best use of the City employee's time? WHAT?
There you have it, the exact reason Oil City looks like and always will look like it does. APATHY at the top. GO TO FRANKLIN AND ASK THEM HOW THEY DO IT!!!
If we don't put pride in our appearance at the top of every CITY supervisor & employees's list, we CAN FORGET ABOUT anything else getting accomplished.
For goodness sake THE CITY installed all those plantings!!!! Not the taxpayers!!! I am at a loss for words here (well, sort of).
Why is it that TAX PAYERS have to take the initiative to go to council and get cigarette butt containers and garbage cans installed downtown? That is insane! Just have whomever is responsible for taking care of the city streets and fining litterbugs do their job!! It's that simple: do your job! Write parking tickets, stop the loitering in front and back of buildings, crack down on landlords downtown with buildings that look like crap! RIDE them and RIDE them until it is fixed. It is not the TAXPAYER or the VOLUNTEER'S job!!! That is why we pay taxes. ENOUGH EXCUSES. Again, if it can't be done, HOW DOES FRANKLIN DO IT??
(BTW -I still like you and this blog, John!)
I'm glad you still appreciate the blog. I'm not sure if I'm appreciating it much right now.
In the big scheme of things, I think you and I are in general agreement about cleaning up our downtown and neighborhoods.
I can tell you with certainty, that in every city, including Franklin the effort was led by citizens interested in the downtown more than by city government itself. In fact, one of the overriding strengths in Franklin in recent years has been the willingness of business owners, community groups and volunteers has been to step up and do what needs done rather than asking someone else to do it. We are seeing more of that spirit in Oil City and that is a good thing.
You can't separate city council/city government from the citizenry or taxpayers. That's part of the problem. All of us collectively are our community and our government.
Give me a call sometime and we can talk.
Hi John. You have got to stop taking these comments so personally! Their just words on a blog. Sometimes they make a good point. I don't mind at all if you disagree with someone. I would be more worried if you agreed with everyone! Let the snide stuff roll of your back.
I will go out on a limb here and say that I can not see what benefit the telemarketing firms bring to O.C. The employees should not ever be permitted to hang out and smoke in groups. What the heck? At what other business do the employees come out in one group and stand around on the sidewalks and smoke? It's bizarre and it looks ridiculous. They should provide them with a somking room inside so the rest of us don't have to see them.
There also needs to be more credit given to the building owners and employees that take pride in their properties. Bob Fry's business is a great example. It's like a living Norman Rockwell painting and is incredibly charming. Even the insightful sign is a unique attraction. That corner looks amazing.
Then however you need only look to the other side of the sreet and see lack of interest. It's a shame those blighted properties are adjacent to such an amazing church. You have to wonder how many second hand stores a town can support!
There really are only a few sections in town like that need a addressed. Former Brody's block comes to mind. What's going on with it? I think I read that the ORA has been working on it for two years now. Two years? Maybe someone needs to light a fire under them! I say, get that mess down and put in a parking lot with nice landscaping! I'm sure you agree too John.
I agree with the last post. At least you have the guts to get out there and make comments and voice your opinion. The rest of Council just barely speak in the meetings for fear of being quoted by the paper.
Do the other members not know about this blog? Why don't they get on it, identify themselves and tell us their thoughts? It is a great vehicle for getting info out and debating important town topics.
I will say it's nuts that someone takes your quotes and dices them up word by word. Good lord Scott, get a life! The world won't end because someone wanted to put a fence up or whatever.
And yes, I am one of the gutless Anon. commenters. Better than being assailed by someone who is getting bogged down in the minutia of life.
Keep up the good work John. Only other suggestion I would make is to not spend so much time carefully choosing and parsing your words. Say whatever you want and mean what you say! It's only O.C. and if the worse thing that happens to you is you don't get re-elected, well that's the town's loss, in my opinion, and you would have far less thankless stress!
BTW, I am not in anyway related to John and DO NOT agree with everything he says.
So, Chad, Lee, Neil, Sonja - what are your thoughts on these or other issues? Venice & Bill what are your thoughts? Let's hear them!
Sorry for the delayed response to the last two people who commented.
First on the Brody building. ORA has been working closely with the city and I can't say enough about their cooperation and efforts. The problem is we need a willing seller at a price that is within reason. The building has no value and the cost of demolition is a couple hundred thou.
The Blight Committee recently officially declared the property blighted and there are a host of code violations Hopefully the owners will see the light.
I undersstand the frustration with the telemarketing firms. At the time they were recruited, at least the first one, I think the image the company represented was much different than what turned out to be the reality. Hindsight is always 20/20. At the time, it sounded like a positive development. At least they are jobs and filling some space.
The point of pride in property is absolutely correct. If everyone took Bob Fry's approach a large part the city's problems would be solved.
I can't speak for the other members of council. I would welcome having them participate.
"I undersstand the frustration with the telemarketing firms. At the time they were recruited, at least the first one, I think the image the company represented was much different than what turned out to be the reality. Hindsight is always 20/20. At the time, it sounded like a positive development. At least they are jobs and filling some space."
Are you saying that the council was deceived by the telemarketing firms?
I'm not sure if deceived is the right word, and the council at the time certainly would not have been the only ones that to have had a somewhat different impression. The Oil City-based economic development agency at the time and the community at-large I think had a different idea of what was to be with the original telemarketing firm that how it played out.
Again, hindsight is always 20/20.
Post a Comment